GNOME.org
 

Gtkmm-forge Digest, Vol 20, Issue 4

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-owner lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs. Do not try to unsubscribe gtkmm-forge from gtkmm-list.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 510235] Added patch for glibc GChecksum	binding
      (glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
   2. [Bug 510235] Added patch for glibc GChecksum	binding
      (glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
   3. [Bug 510235] Added patch for glibc GChecksum	binding
      (glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
   4. [Bug 510080] Patch for a few giomm fixes (patch	for revision
      513 of subversion) (glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
   5. [Bug 505766] Gtk::RecentAction must derive from
      Gtk::RecentChooser (gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
   6. [Bug 510235] Added patch for glibc GChecksum	binding
      (glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
   7. [Bug 510235] Added patch for glibc GChecksum	binding
      (glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
   8. [Bug 510235] Added patch for glibc GChecksum	binding
      (glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:48:18 +0000 (UTC)
From: "glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
	<bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 510235] Added patch for glibc GChecksum
	binding
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Message-ID: <20080117174818 48D9023F51D label gnome org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510235

  glibmm | general | Ver: 2.4.x




------- Comment #1 from Naveen Verma  2008-01-17 17:48 UTC -------
Created an attachment (id=103078)
 --> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=103078&action=view)
GChecksum binding patch


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510235.



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:14:59 +0000 (UTC)
From: "glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
	<bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 510235] Added patch for glibc GChecksum
	binding
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Message-ID: <20080117181459 674AF23F51D label gnome org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510235

  glibmm | general | Ver: 2.4.x

Murray Cumming changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |murrayc murrayc com




------- Comment #2 from Murray Cumming  2008-01-17 18:14 UTC -------
You have not used any _CLASS_* method, or any _WRAP_METHOD(). I don't know why.
Thanks, but I will probably just do this myself some time.


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510235.



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:48:19 +0000 (UTC)
From: "glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
	<bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 510235] Added patch for glibc GChecksum
	binding
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Message-ID: <20080117184819 35A4123F51D label gnome org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510235

  glibmm | general | Ver: 2.4.x




------- Comment #3 from Naveen Verma  2008-01-17 18:48 UTC -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> You have not used any _CLASS_* method, or any _WRAP_METHOD(). I don't know why.
> Thanks, but I will probably just do this myself some time.
> 

I have used _WRAP_METHOD() for a few functions like update() and get_string().
But for some reason these functions did not get added in the generated code(.h,
.cc), then I change them as normal function definitions. I would really like to
know the reason why it did not work for me. So that I can take care about it
later.


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510235.



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:18:32 +0000 (UTC)
From: "glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
	<bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 510080] Patch for a few giomm fixes
	(patch	for revision 513 of subversion)
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Message-ID: <20080117191832 E6A0C23F51D label gnome org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510080

  glibmm | general | Ver: 2.15.x

Marko Anastasov changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |marko anastasov gmail com
 Attachment #103044|none                        |committed
               Flag|                            |
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #2 from Marko Anastasov  2008-01-17 19:18 UTC -------
Thanks, I have committed the changes which do not overlap with recent work in
trunk (Mount, Seekable). I have also kept back the addition
FileAttributeInfo::empty() for now.


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510080.



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:12:24 +0000 (UTC)
From: "gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
	<bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 505766] Gtk::RecentAction must derive
	from	Gtk::RecentChooser
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Message-ID: <20080118111224 7333F23F5A9 label gnome org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505766

  gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.12.x

Murray Cumming changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #3 from Murray Cumming  2008-01-18 11:12 UTC -------
Committed to trunk and the gtkmm-2-12 branch, to appear in a new gtkmm 2.12.x
tarball soon.

2008-01-18  Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>

        * gtk/src/recentaction.hg:
        Derive (and implement) from RecentChooser so this is actually usable.
        This changes ABI (object size), but nobody could have been using this
yet.
        (Bug #505766, Denes Faluvegi)

Thanks. Please do check that this is now usable for you.


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505766.



------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:59:41 +0000 (UTC)
From: "glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
	<bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 510235] Added patch for glibc GChecksum
	binding
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Message-ID: <20080118135941 8447823F5A9 label gnome org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510235

  glibmm | general | Ver: 2.4.x




------- Comment #4 from Naveen Verma  2008-01-18 13:59 UTC -------
Created an attachment (id=103141)
 --> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=103141&action=view)
Updated patch for checksum

This time i have used _CLASS_* and WRAP_METHOD macro. Which remove much of hand
written code.
The only one thing i did not understand how to make a conversion of any
datatype if it is not already defined using _CONVERSION().
In checksum class if we define two conversion macro one from Checksum to
GChecksum
and another from const glib::ustring to const guchar* then we can define more
functions my using WRAP_METHOD macro.


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510235.



------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:10:09 +0000 (UTC)
From: "glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
	<bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 510235] Added patch for glibc GChecksum
	binding
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Message-ID: <20080118161009 7AB1E23F5B5 label gnome org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510235

  glibmm | general | Ver: 2.4.x




------- Comment #5 from Murray Cumming  2008-01-18 16:10 UTC -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=103141)
 --> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=103141&action=view) [edit]
> Updated patch for checksum
> 
> This time i have used _CLASS_* and WRAP_METHOD macro. Which remove much of hand
> written code.

Great. That's much better. But I think you can probably use _WRAP_METHOD() for
those static functions too.

> The only one thing i did not understand how to make a conversion of any
> datatype if it is not already defined using _CONVERSION().
> In checksum class if we define two conversion macro one from Checksum to
> GChecksum
> and another from const glib::ustring to const guchar* then we can define more
> functions my using WRAP_METHOD macro.

You can add a _CONVERSION line in one of the tools/m4/convert_*.m4 files.


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510235.



------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC)
From: "glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
	<bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 510235] Added patch for glibc GChecksum
	binding
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Message-ID: <20080118170200 90CDD23F5B1 label gnome org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510235

  glibmm | general | Ver: 2.4.x




------- Comment #6 from Naveen Verma  2008-01-18 17:01 UTC -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Created an attachment (id=103141)
 --> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=103141&action=view) [edit]
> > Updated patch for checksum
> > 
> > This time i have used _CLASS_* and WRAP_METHOD macro. Which remove much of hand
> > written code.
> 
> Great. That's much better. But I think you can probably use _WRAP_METHOD() for
> those static functions too.

Yes you are write that one thing can be done after define _CONVERSION macro for
conversion from ChecksumType to GChecksumType as I stated in last message. I
have got some suggestion how to create _CONVERSION macro one from you also in
this message. I am looking into that. Soon I will add another patch with
changes. 


> 
> > The only one thing i did not understand how to make a conversion of any
> > datatype if it is not already defined using _CONVERSION().
> > In checksum class if we define two conversion macro one from Checksum to
> > GChecksum
> > and another from const glib::ustring to const guchar* then we can define more
> > functions my using WRAP_METHOD macro.
> 
> You can add a _CONVERSION line in one of the tools/m4/convert_*.m4 files.
> 


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510235.



------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest, Vol 20, Issue 4
******************************************
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]