Re: New gtkmm24.2.6.9-2.fc4.i386



On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 18:22 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > More on the topic, does anyone one what happened to libatkmm.so in 2.6.9 ?
> 
> Eek. I guess I need to investigate. There's a special patch that maybe
> got into cvs or the tarball that never should have.
> 
> If this did get into the tarball, you (as a distro packager) should be
> telling me and _not_ just packaging it. If you have, please revert
> immediately. You know that gtkmm is _meant_ to be ABI stable.

I just released gtkmm 2.6.10, so please check that it fixes this
problem. Let's consider gtkmm 2.6.9 totally broken and useless.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]