Re: TreeView Design

["Jonathon Jongsma" <jonathon jongsma gmail com>]

On 8/31/06, Gareth Foster <earthwormgaz googlemail com> wrote:
> > Well, most of the modern frameworks have that kind of generalization. If
> > you want to implement something similar you can not do that without having
> > your own "Type"s. You have to start from scratch and write the hole
> > framework what is not a simple task. Sometimes shared interface is needed
> > even for basic types.
> >
>
> Well, okay. If anyone knows otherwise, or has seen a good
> implementation of a treeview, that is slightly more simplistic, I'd be
> greatful for a link.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gaz

It seems that half of this conversation has been on-list and half
off-list, and I still don't really understand quite what you're
asking, so I'm a bit confused...

--
jonner