Re: [gtkmm] Re: [sigc] Doing a 'catch-code' library for the propesed functionality cuts in SigC++



On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 16:41, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Brett Viren <bv bnl gov> writes:
> > One thing I would hope for is that libsigcx could be distributed with
> > and (with a configure time option) built along with libsigc++ proper.
> > 
> You mean sigcx should be included in the sigc tarball? I doubt Murray
> will be in favor of that.

No, I am not. A separate library is a separate library, ideally with a
separate maintainer.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]