Re: Compile Error on FC5 (was "Re: gtkdatabox-0.8.0.0 released")
- From: "Eric Work" <work eric gmail com>
- To: "Roland Bock" <box2OO6 eudoxos de>
- Cc: gtkdatabox-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Compile Error on FC5 (was "Re: gtkdatabox-0.8.0.0 released")
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:56:25 -0800
Roland,
I executed the two commands you mentioned below on both my 64-bit
Ubuntu system and a 32-bit Fedora 8 VM and both produce the same
output, identical to what's included in 0.8.0.1 (except minor
formatting). I'm not sure why 64-bit Fedora 7/8/9 does not compile
without that patch. The strange thing is that 32-bit Fedora 7/8/9 and
64-bit Ubuntu 7.10 does compile 0.8.0.1 fine. Sounds like some kind
of tool problem (gcc?). From what I can tell glib-genmarshal seems to
do the right thing tagging the function prototype. It sounds like
you're going to be making a few changes pretty soon so I'll wait until
you get the next version out before I update the fedora repos.
-Eric
On Nov 27, 2007 1:56 PM, Roland Bock <box2OO6 eudoxos de> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> thanks for the patch!
>
> The patch worked fine for me and a new version is uploaded. I must admit
> that I am a bit confused that that was necessary, because I created the
> file using a glib tool:
>
>
> glib-genmarshal --header --prefix=gtk_databox_marshal --internal
> gtkdatabox_marshal.list
>
> glib-genmarshal --body --prefix=gtk_databox_marshal --internal
> gtkdatabox_marshal.list
>
> The header seems to be just fine, containing the "G_GNUC_INTERNAL" from
> your patch, but the C file does not contain it.
>
>
> Can you try to run the glib-genmarshal on your machine and see if it
> produces code that works for you? In that case I think of removing the
> gtkdatabox_marshal.[ch]. The files would be created by the make process.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Roland
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]