Re: Gtk2-Extras

[Carl Nygard <cjnygard fast net>]

OR...

Gtk::Ex and Gtk::Ex::Simple.  I think I've seen something similar
package-wise with MIME and MIME::Lite (and MIME::Lite::HTML)

I'd be willing to co-maintain, since I'll be releasing
Gtk2::Ex::TieScalar/TieArrayRef/BindScalar and
Gtk2::Ex::Simple::OptionMenu




On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 14:57, Kevin C. Krinke wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 14:39, Jan Hudec wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 14:34:10 -0400, Kevin C. Krinke wrote:
> > > Following that theme, this seems to make sense to me:
> > >
> > > Gtk2::Ex::Constants
> > > Gtk2::Ex::Simple::Dialogs    (was Gtk2::Extras)
> > > Gtk2::Ex::Simple::ErrorMsg
> > > Gtk2::Ex::Simple::Message
> > > Gtk2::Ex::Simple::Question
> > > Gtk2::Ex::Utils
> > >
> > > Which sounds good, but what about the entire package name or should each
> > > of these modules be separate releases?
> > >
> > > That's probably my biggest problem, what to call the whole thing or do I
> > > chop it up into pieces...
> >
> > I would keep it separate.
> >
> > Unless someone is willing to create a single official package of
> > everything anyone writes under Gtk2::Ex::* -- that would then naturaly
> > be called Gtk2::Ex. Such package would be nice, because it would have
> > higher chance to make it into distributions.
>
> Being that getting this into a distribution is the intent, with
> everyone's consent I'd be willing to prepare and maintain such a package
> with all contributed modules (co-maintainers are certainly welcome to
> join in the fun).
>
> Otherwise it seems I'll be having three packages to produce and
> maintain; Gtk2::Ex::Constants, Gtk2::Ex::Utils and
> Gtk2::Ex::Simple::Dialogs (not that this bothers me, just want to make
> sure it's The Right Thing to do).
>
> A list-vote maybe?
>
> All in favour of one package for the Gtk2::Ex name space vote +1.
> All in favour of many packages for the Gtk2::Ex name space vote -1.