Re: Gtk2::Ex namespace

* Ross McFarland <rwmcfa1 neces com> [2004-06-27 15:52]:
all of this information will be spelled out in

This is all very reasonable; I don't think there's anything to
change about the proposal as such.

I'm posting to mention something that just occured to me about
the name -- there is a precent for this kind of situation, and
it's set by the DBI. In its case, extension modules that are not
"official DBI" go into the DBIx:: namespace.

I'm not sure this would be very applicable here, however, since
"Gtk2x" has a confusing connotation ("does that mean Gtk 2.x?").
It's just something I thought should be tossed into the mix
before things are set in stone for eternity.

"If you can't laugh at yourself, you don't take life seriously enough."

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]