Re: Hello, some of us still care about memory usage

----- Original Message -----
> From: Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre mecheye net>
> To: Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh yahoo com>
> Cc: Olav Vitters <olav vitters nl>; "gtk-list gnome org" <gtk-list gnome org>
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Hello, some of us still care about memory usage
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh yahoo com> 
> wrote:
>>  I haven't written a Qt application in my life. I do have a gtk+-based 
> (through Perl bindings) application though.
>>  But to me it looks like gtk+ more and more lags behind Qt. I am still 
> waiting for a detailed answer proving otherwise.
> The grass is always greener on the other side. Ever since Nokia
> dropped funding for Qt, both it and GTK+ are both community projects
> at this point.


I am asking about _features_ and _capabilities_.

For example, today I wouldn't even consider gtk+ because Qt comes with Qt-script and QML which are enough "Perlish" (actually, it's close to JavaScript, which is enough "Perlish" - closures, anonymity, etc).

I.e. had I started today, I would have written my application in Qt + Qt-script + QML.

But let's get back to basics.

1) is gtk+ faster than Qt ?
2) does gtk+ consume less memory than Qt ?
3) do gtk+ widgets better preserve their visual quality with changing screen resolution ?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]