Re: Hello, some of us still care about memory usage

[Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh yahoo com>]

>________________________________
> From: Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>
>To: Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh yahoo com> 
>Cc: John Lindgren <john lindgren aol com>; "gtk-list gnome org" <gtk-list gnome org> 
>Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:59 AM
>Subject: Re: Hello, some of us still care about memory usage
> 
>
>
>
>
>On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh yahoo com> wrote:
>
>
>>Is then switching to Qt a viable/practical alternative ?
>>
>
> this list is not an appropriate forum to discuss the relative merits of both toolkits.
>
>
>

Why ?

Aren't gtk+ developers the most appropriate persons to explain in what gtk+ is better ?

...

The OP has a problem with gtk+ support on Windows; AFAIR Qt was meant to be cross-platform; from your reply it's clear there are not enough resources among gtk+ developers to support the Windows port, so, taking all this into consideration, I think my question is quite practical and in order.

Regards,
  Sergei.