Re: [gtk-list] Re: vi bindings, emacs bindings, and all other bindings
- From: George <jirka 5z com>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: vi bindings, emacs bindings, and all other bindings
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 12:56:32 -0700
On Wed, Jul 08, 1998 at 01:25:01PM -0400, James Gardiner wrote:
> Why not make that the default for all GTK+ apps and then also allow bindings
> for menus, keys, etc. that users like. The reason I'm proposing this is that
> if we don't find some common ground to start this proposal, we're gonna have
> everybody jumping up and down trying to get their favorite bindings as the
> default. I've never used CUA knowingly, but it seems that I heard that it was
> used as the basis for some apps in the past.
I for one don't care what the default is ... as long as I can change it ...
I dsoubt vi bindings would be a good default for a lot of people ... people
that like vi usually have enough knowledge to go change it somewhere
George
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
George Lebl <jirka@5z.com> http://www.5z.com/jirka/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following implements RSA in perl and is illegal to export from the US:
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]