Re: BMP chars lacking fonts
- From: "James H. Cloos Jr." <cloos jhcloos com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: silgraphite-devel lists sourceforge net, gtk-i18n-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: BMP chars lacking fonts
- Date: 23 Aug 2003 13:51:55 -0400
>>>>> "Owen" == Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> writes:
Owen> The "checklist of glyphs" approach bothers me a bit because it
Owen> leads to fonts ... which have the "Unicode table" form
Owen> of the characters without the necessary shaped forms of the
Owen> glyphs ...
That is a good point. The family I am (slowly [SIGH]) working on is
intended to Do The Right Thing for each script it (will) cover(s);
the level of research that entails is daunting.
>> Most of the characters that are "illegal" show up as <F00B>, but
>> the variation selectors (after a non-variable character or after
>> nothing) show up as a hexed box.
Owen> Not sure what you mean by <FOOB>.
I get a "less hex hex hex hex greater" tuple in blue; the characters
in the uploaded file OTOH all give the hex box in the normal foreground
colour.
-JimC
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]