Re: BMP chars lacking fonts
- From: "James H. Cloos Jr." <cloos jhcloos com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: silgraphite-devel lists sourceforge net, gtk-i18n-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: BMP chars lacking fonts
- Date: 22 Aug 2003 22:13:15 -0400
>>>>> "Owen" == Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> writes:
>> There are now only 244 BMP chars listed in UnicodeData.txt that
>> pango attempts to paint and for which I have no free / libre font.
Owen> But how many characters are in the BMP that you have fonts that
Owen> cover, but not to render correctly?
That is a good point, and one I cannot answer w/o learning several
new scripts. ;-/
It is I think cool, though, that coverage is close to complete.
Owen> Are the VARIATION SElECTOR characters really printable
Owen> characters?
Only as combining characters following (if you want to follow the
unicode std strictly) a rather small set of math characters as well
as several mongolian characters.
Most of the characters that are "illegal" show up as <F00B>, but
the variation selectors (after a non-variable character or after
nothing) show up as a hexed box.
Owen> And what's magical about the BMP?
Only that non-BMP characters all show up as ? for me (ie a question
mark). I eagerly await non-BMP support. :)
When the non-BMP actually display I'll update my site w/ them as well.
-JimC
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]