Am Sonntag, den 16.03.2008, 11:22 -0400 schrieb Dominic Lachowicz: > Hi Tor, > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 4:27 AM, Tor Lillqvist <tml iki fi> wrote: > > > I think that they're ready to go. Outside of the GTK+ tree, they won't > > > get much testing. > > > > Do you think they cam unconditionally replace the "traditional" > > loaders that depend on external libraries for Win32, or should we add > > some --disable-gdiplus-loaders switch to the configury? > > I'd have them unconditionally replace the traditional loaders wherever > the format is supported by the GDI+ plugin. I'd unconditionally add > the formats supported by this plugin but not by GdkPixbuf (i.e. WMF > and EMF). And I'd still build the traditional XPM, ANI, etc. plugins, > as they don't have any external dependencies. So what are your plans for PNG tEXt records? Does GDI+ support them? Unconditionally replacing the libpng loader, without supporting that records would be a regression. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Hasselmann <mathias hasselmann gmx de> Openismus GmbH: http://www.openismus.com/ Personal Site: http://taschenorakel.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil