Re: Move to LGPL3

Am Samstag, den 15.03.2008, 21:48 +0100 schrieb Tim Janik:
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> > This topic was discussed recently on foundation-list.
> >
> >
> >
> > In summary, attempting to relicence the library would be, in practise,
> > impossible.
> >
> > No further benefit is gained by discussing this topic further.
> Updating the glib & gtk+ headers to LGPLv3 is not relicensing.

Alternative interpretation: You fork under "LGPLv3 or later", as
permitted by "LGPLv2.1 or later" and keep "LGPLv3 or later" for the

Well, but I am no expert on legal stuff...

Mathias Hasselmann <mathias hasselmann gmx de>
Openismus GmbH:
Personal Site:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]