On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 21:39 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote: > On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 00:37 +0100, Hans Breuer wrote: > > On 10.01.2005 17:18, Owen Taylor wrote: > > > Branches for the stable GLib-2.6.x and GTK+-2.6.x series have now been > > > created, named: > > > > > > GLIB: glib-2-6 > > > GTK+: gtk-2-6 > > > > > > Notes: > > > > > > - These are the branches for GNOME-2.10 > > > - GTK+ HEAD is going to grow a Cairo dependency soon, so if you > > > hit that, that should be a reminder about this mail :-) > > Does this mean GTK+ will 'grow' that dependency regardless of the > > availability of a win32 backend for cairo, see (still pending): > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/cairo/2004-November/002118.html > > I don't plan on waiting to commit anything to CVS until we have a > working win32 backend. Changed my mind on this (moments before committing something to CVS...), breaking the win32 build strikes me as a something that we shouldn't do, since it will make it hard to follow our procedure of committing all bug-fixes into HEAD and stable at once. So right now, win32/Cairo is sitting right on my critical path... I'm wondering if you have a version of your port around (the link in your earlier mail is broken) so I can compare it to the GDI+ stuff in CVS currently.. Regards, Owen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part