Re: State of GTK+ on Windows (Was: gtk 2 or 3)

From: Allin Cottrell <cottrell wfu edu>
To: gtk-app-devel-list <gtk-app-devel-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: State of GTK+ on Windows (Was: gtk 2 or 3)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:00:04 -0400 (EDT)

On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, John Emmas wrote:

I don't think Tor has any need to be beating himself up over
gtk-win32...


I'd agree with that; I've been very pleased with GTK performance
on Windows, mostly. This is going with Tor's recommendation to use
the GTK 2.16 runtime as the most stable to date on win32.

Allin Cottrell

Follow-Ups:
- Re: State of GTK+ on Windows (Was: gtk 2 or 3)
  - From: Vincent Torri

References:
- gtk 2 or 3
  - From: Aleksandar Lazic
- Re: gtk 2 or 3
  - From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: gtk 2 or 3
  - From: Allin Cottrell
- Re: gtk 2 or 3
  - From: Tor Lillqvist
- Re: gtk 2 or 3
  - From: Aleksandar Lazic
- Re: gtk 2 or 3
  - From: Tor Lillqvist
- State of GTK+ on Windows (Was: gtk 2 or 3)
  - From: Neil Bird
- Re: State of GTK+ on Windows (Was: gtk 2 or 3)
  - From: John Emmas

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]