Re: GObject docs improvements
- From: tomas tuxteam de
- To: gtk-app-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GObject docs improvements
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:08:52 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:49:46PM +0100, David NeÄas (Yeti) wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 02:05:27PM -0600, Shixin Zeng wrote:
[...]
2)How its intefaces handled, when a class is derived? Will the child
classes possess the same interfaces, if they don't want to reimplement
them?
Yes, it will (a non-transitive is-a relation would be very
very strange).
Ha! Gotcha. When talking about interfaces you might rather say
"implements-a" rather that "is-a" :-)
I do belong to the camp that believes that interfaces are just poor man's
multiple inheritance (whether you believe that or not deends, I think,
on whether you maintain that an object is defined by its behaviour).
But don't take me all too seriously here, I tend to be an OO heretic and
risk every time getting burnt .-)
Regards
- -- tomÃs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF0eKUBcgs9XrR2kYRAlfXAJwNLH77FITeugw9UG0v3HC/LOnPJACfVa43
AOGxRJF92AgXVDIPvsRVkBU=
=Oqsg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]