Re: Is now gdk-bixbuf the part of gtk+-2?

["John (J5) Palmieri" <johnp redhat com>]

On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 09:16 +0200, David Necas (Yeti) wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 06:02:58PM -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > Actually I believe you do.  On Fedora gdk-pixbuf is a separate package
> > so if a developer doesn't have gdk-pixbuf-devel package installed
> > configure should detect this and throw an error.
>
> Please don't confuse people.  There is a standalone
> gdk-pixbuf rpm on Fedora, but it's the old standalone
> gdk-pixbuf, which people probably don't install at all
> nowadays.  The Gtk+-2.0 gdk-pixbuf is a part of gtk2
> package.

Ah, my fault. Sorry for the confusion.

-- 
John (J5) Palmieri <johnp redhat com>