Re: Is now gdk-bixbuf the part of gtk+-2?

["John (J5) Palmieri" <johnp redhat com>]

On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 09:25 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Yury Aliaev wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering whether the gdk-pixbuf library is the required part of modern 
> > gtk+ distributions (I mean 2.6.x and 2.8.x)? In other words, should I add 
> > extra check in configure in for gdk-pixbuf in my gtk+-2 application?
>
> You don't need an extra configure check, since gdk-pixbuf is an 
> integral part of the gtk+-2 package (that is, it will be missing 
> only if the gtk+-2 installation is broken).

Actually I believe you do.  On Fedora gdk-pixbuf is a separate package
so if a developer doesn't have gdk-pixbuf-devel package installed
configure should detect this and throw an error.

-- 
John (J5) Palmieri <johnp redhat com>