Re: Is now gdk-bixbuf the part of gtk+-2?

["David Necas (Yeti)" <yeti physics muni cz>]

On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 06:02:58PM -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> Actually I believe you do.  On Fedora gdk-pixbuf is a separate package
> so if a developer doesn't have gdk-pixbuf-devel package installed
> configure should detect this and throw an error.

Please don't confuse people.  There is a standalone
gdk-pixbuf rpm on Fedora, but it's the old standalone
gdk-pixbuf, which people probably don't install at all
nowadays.  The Gtk+-2.0 gdk-pixbuf is a part of gtk2
package.

Yeti


--
That's enough.