Re: dynamic containers issue

["Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>]

Hi,

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeenix gmail com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Juan A. Suarez Romero
> <jasuarez igalia com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 18:34 +0200, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 19:21 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>>
>> BTW, is Rygel supporting the last version of spec?
>
>   No because we still seem to have open issues and no app is yet
> providing anything.   Before I go on and start implementing stuff I
> need to know your choice here:
>
>  "To summarize the discussion, if you are going to implement the
> solution I proposed (or some variant of it) along with the limiting
> child count you already have, there is no problem making this property
> compulsory. OTOH if you are not going for that solution, I really want
> to know how you are going to deal with the incremental browse issue I
> mentioned."

  So which way is it?

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124