Re: dynamic containers issue

["Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>]

Hi,

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Juan A. Suarez Romero
<jasuarez igalia com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 19:16 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> > Now, it is there, but still I need to cope with the non-paging browsing.
>> > Which fits nice for static content, but not so nice for content like
>> > Youtube
>>
>>   Since non-paged browsing is a specific form of paged-browsing, I
>> don't see why it should be a problem for you.The client can ask for
>> ALL children of a container even if you only provide paged-browsing
>> APIs so you'll have to handle that anyways.
>
> Yes, sure. And I'm handling it. But actually if client queries *all*
> elements in a single page, then it is her problem: she never ever should
> get all elements in a single page.
>
>>
>> >. And of course, with the ItemCount and ContainerCount.
>>
>>   Dude, they are optional for a few weeks now and I didn't say we
>> should make them mandatory in this discussion, we are only talking of
>> ChildCount property now.
>
> So, maybe I was confusing but, is there 3 count-keys then: ItemCount,
> ContainerCount and ChildCount, being the 2 former optional and later
> compulsory?

   Yes!


-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124