Re: Simulation Analysis in the User's guide - review needed

[Adrian Custer <acuster gmail com>]

Fantastic!

The best strategy would be to open up a bug report "Doc improvements for
simulation" or some such. Then you can attach your work to that and
anyone who has energy read and comment.

Have a fun two weeks, not too fun though because there's the rest of
married life to follow...

--adrian



On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:08 -0700, Louis Luangkesorn wrote:
> I have been working on documentation for the Simulation tool for the
> User's Guide.  It is pretty rough right now, but it needs a technical
> review.  What is here is what I have figured out through trial and
> error, and some diving into the interface and code, but it would
> require a minor miracle for there not to be outright errors in here.
> Is there someone who understands the simulation part of Gnumeric well
> enough to review?  Adrian Custer is aware of this, and the intent is
> for this to be added to the docs when complete.
>
> It has the following sections:
> 6.5 Simulation Analysis
> 6.5.1 Introduction to Simulation Analysis
> 6.5.2 Setting up Simulation Model
> 6.5.3 Running the Simulation
> 6.5.4 Simulation output
> 6.5.5 Using SIMTABLE
> Currently, there is an OpenOffice.org document, and a Gnumeric
> spreadsheet that was used to create the examples and I can send those
> to whoever reviews this.  As I was learning as I went, the screenshots
> will be redone once the text and example workflow is settled.  I do
> not expect to be touching this again for about 2 weeks (wedding and
> honeymoon!) so there would be time for the review.
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> Louis
>
> "Do one thing every day that scares you." – Eleanor Roosevelt
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnumeric-list mailing list
> gnumeric-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list