Re: Gnumeric vs. OOCalc

On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 04:38, Parrenin Frédéric wrote:
If you need to show these numbers, Calc is still better because it has
more features:
- The charting engine is not finished in gnumeric
- Drawing objects support is also very rough (lines, rectangles, labels,
- wmf images inserted in xls files are not imported
- lack of Rich text formatting inside cells
- lack of support for cells styles
- lack of "follow modifications"
- lack of spell checking
- lack of "split panes"

I don't use Calc or XL, so I can't compare, but I thought "split panes"
is what Gnumeric calls "frozen panes".

- lack of text orientation
- rough support of headers and footers for printing

"rough"? What are you looking for that you can't do in Gnumeric? 

Andreas J. Guelzow
Taliesin Software, Shelties, Pyrsheps
and Shetland Sheep

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]