On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 04:38, Parrenin Frédéric wrote:
If you need to show these numbers, Calc is still better because it has more features: - The charting engine is not finished in gnumeric - Drawing objects support is also very rough (lines, rectangles, labels, ...) - wmf images inserted in xls files are not imported - lack of Rich text formatting inside cells - lack of support for cells styles - lack of "follow modifications" - lack of spell checking - lack of "split panes"
I don't use Calc or XL, so I can't compare, but I thought "split panes" is what Gnumeric calls "frozen panes".
- lack of text orientation - rough support of headers and footers for printing
"rough"? What are you looking for that you can't do in Gnumeric? Andreas -- Andreas J. Guelzow Taliesin Software, Shelties, Pyrsheps and Shetland Sheep
Description: This is a digitally signed message part