Re: was autogen and make
- From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <fsmla xinara org>
- To: Gnumeric List <gnumeric-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: was autogen and make
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 22:45:50 +0200
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 14:02:29 -0400, Jody Goldberg wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:36:06AM -0600, Robert Jerrard wrote:
The debian unstable package lists have 2.2 but do not include these two
libs in 2.4.
Looks like the debian packages are called -2.2
Yes, as the libraries that are built are named libgnomeprint(ui)-2-2.
but have version 2.4.x.
In unstable. Experimental has the 2.6 ones.
You may still have trouble building 1.3.0, it depends on gtk-2.4.
I'm not sure what it's packaging status is.
It too is in experimental, just like GNOME 2.6 [*] which builds on it. They
will move to unstable at some point, but current discussion
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/debian-release-200404/msg00082.html)
suggests that may take a while yet.
Gnumeric 1.3.0 is buildable using using unstable + experimental, as was CVS
HEAD last time I tried.
Ray
[*] For details:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 19:59:37 +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
see
http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?GnomeTwoDotSix
--
Pinky, Are You Pondering What I'm Pondering?
I think so Brain, but "instant karma" always gets so lumpy.
Pinky and the Brain in "Brainwashed Part 3: Wash Harder"
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]