Re: freeze panes bug

["Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow math concordia ab ca>]

HI,

I definitely agree that graphs are much more important, but wouldn't it 
be more reasonable to freeze only a minimum (ie. 1 column in the second 
example, rather than 6?).

But of course that doesn't really matter. (Hey, I don't ever use frozen 
panes anyways.)

Andreas

Jody Goldberg wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:23:39AM -0600, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
>
> > Yesterday I showed gnumeric to a colleague (who will be suing it in a 
> > statistics class this fall) and encountered the following unexpected 
> > feature:
> >
> > If you select B7 and choose `freeze panes' rows 1 through 6 and column A 
> > is frozen as expected.
> >
> > but:
> >
> > if you slect A7 and choose `freeze panes' rows 1 through 6 and columns A 
> > to F are frozen when I would have expected only rows 1 through 6 to be 
> > frozen.
>
>
> This is a known limitation rather than a bug.  I have not
> implemented horizontal/vertical only splits.  It is not difficult,
> but graphs are more important for now.  

> If anyone interested I can
> point you in the right direction.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnumeric-list mailing list
> gnumeric-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list


--
Prof. Dr. Andreas J. Guelzow                    
Assoc. Prof of Mathematics
Concordia University College of Alberta
http://www.math.concordia.ab.ca/aguelzow