Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Again: STUN

[Malcolm Caldwell <malcolm caldwell ntu edu au>]

On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 19:44 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote:
> Le jeudi 23 mars 2006 �1:32 +0100, Jan Schampera a �it :
> > On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:46:47 +0100
> > Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com> wrote:
> > 
> > > If you find a way to have that working without having to add a
> > > preference, then I'm all ears and ready to implement it.
> > 
> > Yannick brought a nice idea. Imagine the possibility to have a
> > comma-separated list of servers (maybe only the first 2 are respected)
> > in the entry field and re-label it "STUN server_s_".
> > 
> > This mail is not about commas or spaces, or two or ten servers. Just to
> > know if that way would be a golden middle way between functionality and
> > user friendness.
> 
> 1) Not user-friendly
> 2) Sounds like a work-around to me
> 
> That kind of thing SHOULD NOT be in the GUI from my point of view.

It SHOULD NOT be in the gui, and it should not be hard coded?
So, the remaining options are 1) gconf key or 2) just don't add the
ability to have multiple STUN servers?

With 1): gconf keys have always reminded me of the worst of windows.
With 2): we end up with most peoples ekiga relying on one server always
being up.