Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Again: STUN

[Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>]

If you find a way to have that working without having to add a
preference, then I'm all ears and ready to implement it.


Le lundi 20 mars 2006 à 12:23 +0100, Jan Schampera a écrit :
> Hi.
> 
> I want to raise discussion about a kind of secondary STUN server again,
> because this morning, our STUN was down again.
> 
> The behaviour of a STUN check detecting "blocked" and a STUN server not
> responding is identical, so the registration to various SIP services
> fail.
> 
> I consider a "secondary STUN server", which is used when the "primary"
> detected "blocked", to double-check the result as a user friendly
> feature.
> 
> Jan
> 
-- 
 _      Damien Sandras
(o-     
//\     Ekiga Softphone: http://www.ekiga.org/
v_/_    FOSDEM 2006    : http://www.fosdem.org/
        SIP Phone      : sip:dsandras ekiga net
                         sip:600000 ekiga net