Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Again: STUN

[Julien PUYDT <jpuydt free fr>]

Dan Sandberg a écrit :
> On a related note, why does Ekiga say "User is not acceptable" ( or what
> not ) rather than "STUN server down.  Specify an alternate."  Sure
> would've saved me a good deal of frustration.  "User is not acceptable"
> is about as meaningful as "User sucks" to my ears. :)

Because not receiving an answer from the STUN server normally means you 
are behind a bad firewall... in this case you don't get an answer 
because there's no server, but ekiga can't know the difference.

Snark