Re: Re[4]: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] SIP and GnomeMeeting - please comment

[Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>]

You are not wrong...

I have at least 3 advices. That's nice to see that at least 3 persons on
this devel mailing list are interested in the future of GnomeMeeting and
having constructive discussions. That's also disappointing that only 3
persons are interested, but well, perhaps those are too far plans ;)

I keep in mind both ideas :
- having separate sip: and h323: URLs
- having a unique callto:// URL supporing sip: and h323: "prefixes" to
identify the protocol. No sip or h323, meaning that the default protocol
is used.

I'll discuss that when porting to OPAL with Equivalence to know what
they think of it, but I think both ideas are good and have pros and
cons. Just keep that in mind in the following months so that both ideas
can grow!

Le ven 21/02/2003 à 15:48, Kilian Krause a écrit :
> Hi Damien,
> 
> ..oh i forgot:
> 
> about the point with a browser supporting vhsp:// instead of http://
> 
> well, whom are we comepeting with? don't you think it's GM who might
> set up the http:// style for VoIP?! why not us writing the defaults?
> so if we tell there's that SIP-style and there's the more general VoIP
> notation (callto://) and GM supports both.. who would tell us right
> from wrong? finally, GM _is_ the large VoIP app in the linux world
> (like >90% if i remember well), and NM is dead somewhat.. (and will be
> replaced by GM/win32 sometime)
> 
> please correct me if i'm wrong..
-- 
 _	Damien Sandras
(o-	GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
//\	FOSDEM 2003:  http://www.fosdem.org
v_/_	H.323 phone:  callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com