Re: GUADEC meeting summary

On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 00:06 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
> >         * some stuff that might be considered 'services' is right now in g-s-d,
> > and those (screensaver, typing break) could perfectly be started via the
> > autostart mechanism from gnome-session.
> Though, as I said, we should be very accurate splitting 'services'
> into separate processes. It would be rather expensive. So for every
> "suspect" service we should carefully analyze whether it would be
> "inproc" (in g-s-d) or "outproc" service. Ideally, we could create a
> framework where each service could be made either inproc or outproc
> depending on the configure-time option. Would it make sense?
this should be easy with the modules code I refactored.

> >         * merge keyboard indicators capplet and layout tab
> Do you mean "keyboard indicator plugins"?

> >         * merge layout + timezone (from evolution) + i18n on a i18n capplet
> What about keyboard model and various keyboard options?
probably they can go along layout?

> >         * keyboard + mouse on a 'input devices' capplet
> I like that idea, but IIRC we still did not settle on the issue
> regarding nested GtkNotebooks, did we?
I think it was decided we don't want them.
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]