Re: Header links and developer tools tab bar [Was: LXR link error]

[Fotis Kouretas <fkour sportline gr>]

Just a summary. Is this the idea ?

I'm talking not only for d.g.o since
Thomas has made a good point on g.o navigation
issues.
-----------------------------

BOX
----
Adv:
- More space
- Easier to integrate
- Easy handling and coding

Disadv:
- Only up to second level
(eg. if CVS and Bugilla goes there, no room in
the sub sites for boxed navigation, unless it goes horizontal)


TABBED
-------
Adv:
- More depth
- Could bridge the "tools" and give consistent navigation
- Easy to add in the subs
- Easy to keep 1st to 2nd level connection

Disadv:
- More difficult to code
- Need work in variable width sites
- Difficult to fit in gnome's current top since logo
  defines basic navigation.


BOTH
----
- Clean basic "g.o" navigation (Main sites, subs)
- Provide a consistent look for Navigation
- Both should hold the primary to second level connection

------------------------------

Fotis


Claus Schwarm wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 01:12:00 +1100
> Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org> wrote:
>
>
> > Sure it doesn't now, because it's a totally new element. :-) But this
> > will make the developer sites seem like a coherent toolkit - an
> > attractive idea.
>
>
> Just to make sure we're talking about the same thing: You mean a
> graphical representation of tabs just like kde-apps.org, or the tabs on
> plone-powered sites like ubuntu?
>
> I admit, I have problems understanding why this would make the
> impression of a coherent toolkit - you click on one of the tools, and
> the site design changes, the previous navigation box vanishes, etc.
>
> Well, if other's like the idea...
>
> Cheers, 
> Claus
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-web-list mailing list
> gnome-web-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list