Re: adding new info to GnomeVFSFileInfo



On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 18:55, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> 
> > You already have the information (where this makes sense, e.g. with
> > local file access) in the permissions field of GnomeVFSFileInfo.
> 
> That's not really interesting, on local files, any limitation in
> GnomeVFS can generally easily be workarounded with standard glibc
> function ;) What is needed is a more general approach which is not
> unix-centric and works for remote locations. The API you suggest will
> be nice if it works for all uris and not only local ones.

That's what I intended (in the long run anyway, local stuff will likely
work first).

> > 
> > (Drumroll, please:) "It is on the agenda."
> > 
> 
> On a "Will be done for GNOME2.2" agenda, or a "Will do that some day"
> agenda ? If that won't be ready for GNOME2.2, I think some way to know
> about what we can do with an uri is a must-have for GNOME2.2 (for
> example what I suggested...)

To be precise, it is on my Todo list for enhanced permissions. Whether
that will be there for GNOME 2.2 I cannot say, if only for the fact that
I don't know when GNOME 2.2 is planned (If you need an example for
ignorance at some time in the future, feel free to refer to me ;o).

> > You just have to be a bit patient -- after all, I've just returned from
> > vacation.
> 
> He, sure, getting an answer to one of my mails is already a big
> satisfaction :)

After we have agreed on some very rough API (I still haven't received
any feedback on what I babbled about before my vacation -- *hint* hullo
list!), I'll start coding. Hey I might start coding anyway before that,
thinking about my chances to get any feedback at all :-P. But the more
ideas I receive from someone else, the less I have to get them by
myself, the quicker I can do that. Hu-hum.

Nils
-- 
Nils Philippsen / Berliner Straße 39 / D-71229 Leonberg //
+49.7152.209647
   nils wombat dialup fht-esslingen de / nils redhat de / nils lisas de
   PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
       Ever noticed that common sense isn't really all that common?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]