Re: Bugs

[Donato Marrazzo <donato marrazzo gmail com>]

This is even my feeling: there are few developers for a really short version life (6 months!).

Since Gnome is the face of my OS, I expect robustness more than fancies. I understand that fixing bugs is boring while implement new feature is exciting, but we could meet in the middle.

My 2 cent opinion.

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Marshall Neill <ramien43 windstream net> wrote:

I have a feeling this will upset the developers but I believe it has to be said.,
I recently read that there are 46,000 bugs in Gnome 3.
Now I would think logic would dictate that you fix bugs instead of implementing new features.
Seems like the developers are more interested in change than fixing what is broken.
If that logic was applied to automobiles I believe public outcry would demand that the vehicles be fixed first.
Now, new features that no one really asked for are implemented and the bugs keep piling up and extensions that worked, don't, themes that worked, don't.
Well, enough of my rant.  I think you can see where I am coming from.
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list

--
Ciao Donato