Re: Concerning the javascript code location and extensions

["D.H. Bahr" <dbahr uci cu>]

Thank you, very much, I'll take a look at that asap...

Best regards,

--

Sw.E. D.H. Bahr

Nova Desktop Development Leader

CESOL (Free/Libre Software Centre)

UCI (University of Informatics Sciences)

Havana, Cuba

El Mon, 05-09-2011 a las 12:11 +0200, Antonio Hernández Díaz escribió:
>     
>     
>     2011/9/2 Florian Müllner <fmuellner gnome org>
> >         2011/9/2 Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimilan club fr>
> > >             This can be easily done with a small JS extension, if it doesn't already
> > >             exists. (Though, from a design POV, I really doubt moving the bar to the
> > >             bottom is a good idea, since you need to put the messaging bar somewhere
> > >             else.) 
> > >         
> >         
> >         
> >         Moving the bar is easy, but making it work at the new position will be tricky - for instance, all menus will still open below the bar (read: offscreen), and changing this from an extension will require some rather ugly hacks. 
> >         
> >         
> >         In fact, given that GNOME Shell is a desktop interface (rather than a platform to build desktop interfaces), if you really insist on creating a windows-like interface based on GNOME Shell,a fork is probably a better option (despite the obvious downsides). 
> >         
> >         
> >         
> >         
> > >             > So in order to keep the old environment we would need to keep G2 and
> > >             > G3 on the default system, and that would take just to much space for
> > >             > our Install CDs.
> > >             
> > >             Probably not. gnome-panel+metacity (GNOME3 fallback mode) don't take up
> > >             much space since most of their dependencies are needed by GNOME3
> > >             anyways. You would only need to port your changes to gnome-panel 3,
> > >             which might be easy if you don't use too many deprecated internals. 
> > >         
> >         
> >         
> >          I second that - GNOME3 fallback is much closer to being a platform to build-your-own than GNOME Shell. To get some more GNOME3 niceness, it is also possible to use gnome-panel + standalone mutter (for attached modal dialogs, tiling, improved theming ...). 
> >         
> >         
> >         
> >         
> >         Florian 
> >         
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         gnome-shell-list mailing list
> >         gnome-shell-list gnome org
> >         http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
> >         
> >     
>     
>     
>     
>     Hi all,
>     
>     The team of the Guadalinex distro (I'm included) already has a couple of extensions that transforms Gnome Shell into a "Gnome 2 / Windows-like" desktop.
>     This is because an incoming version, called GECOS, addresses a very specific group of users.
>     
>     We develop two extensions,
>     https://code.launchpad.net/~guadalinex-members/gnome-shell-extension-reflection/trunk
>     https://code.launchpad.net/~guadalinex-members/gnome-shell-extension-windowslist/trunk
>     
>     and also use a modified version of the following: applications-menu, panel-favorites and move-clock
>     https://code.launchpad.net/~guadalinex-members/gnome-shell-extension-applications-menu/gecos
>     https://code.launchpad.net/~guadalinex-members/gnome-shell-extension-panel-favorites/gecos
>     https://code.launchpad.net/~guadalinex-members/gnome-shell-extension-move-clock/gecos
>     
>     Hope this help you.
>     
>     
>     -- 
>     Antonio Hernández
>     
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-shell-list mailing list
> gnome-shell-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list