Re: Terminology (was: Re: Some small ideas for the Shell Panel and Overview)
- From: Colin Walters <walters verbum org>
- To: Adam Williamson <awilliam redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-shell-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Terminology (was: Re: Some small ideas for the Shell Panel and Overview)
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:28:16 -0400
Hi Adam,
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam redhat com> wrote:
>
> Looking at context, I think you're right - thanks for the catch. My
> answer is almost the same, though - I never use that at all, and I agree
> with you and John that it seems completely useless. It's always felt to
> me like something that was put in because no-one could think of anything
> much better to go there. =)
That's not the case; there has always been some design behind it.
Stuff doesn't just happen randomly. See:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/Whiteboards/AppMenu
> In An Ideal World it could maybe replace menu bars in apps entirely, a
> bit like the 'Office' button in recent MS Office releases, but I don't
> see that happening any time this millennium.
Since implementing this is a top priority for 3.2, that'll make the
next release 989 years early!
Note the design goal isn't to replace the menu bar in *all*
applications; rather, some of them.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]