El dom, 30-05-2010 a las 15:51 +0200, Johannes Schmid escribió: > well, either compiz or metacity as both are not possible ;) I think that > was what Florian meant. Exactly. > And well, legacy GNOME involves only gnome-panel and metacity. > And metacity is super stable and slowly moving but still will be a > perfect window-manager for a long time. Certainly. I'd just like to add that metacity will live on in mutter, which of course is very actively developed - so people who want to run legacy GNOME for other reasons than hardware requirements can do so with a mutter + gnome-panel combination (not that I would encourage doing so ...). El dom, 30-05-2010 a las 16:09 +0200, Frederik Nnaji escribió: > ok. Makes sense on the stability side, but i think reducing legacy > GNOME to gnome-panel and metacity alone is a little short on some > ends.. Could you elaborate on that? If you take GNOME Shell out of the equation, you get a very evolutionary update (on the user-visible side at least - under the hood there's a huge platform cleanup)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part