Re: Is it possible to still go to gnome 2.26 even after gnome3 becomes default?

[arshad <arshad3m gmail com>]

On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 14:20 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El sáb, 23-01-2010 a las 11:31 +0100, Jakub Stroleny escribió:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > there is very useful page that was written by Paul Cutler.
> > Please see also the page http://live.gnome.org/GNOME3Myths.
> > 
> > The visible difference between Gnome3 and Gnome2.xx is
> > gnome-shell, but there will be possibility to switch
> > to classic gnome-panel. Then you needn't stay on Gnome2.xx,
> > because Gnome3 can look exactly same as previous line.
> > 
> > I'm not familiar with ubuntu packaging process, but I
> > suppose that there won't be Gnome2 available in future,
> > because it has been redundant.
> > 
> > __
> > J.
> 
> I am really happy to see that I will still be able to use metacity
> since, even liking a lot gnome-shell+mutter (I will probably switch to
> it on machines I am able to), I own some old machines with old graphics
> card that doesn't have 3D support (and, another one that have a "crashy"
> 3D  support (an intel one))
> 
> Thanks for the link :-)
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-shell-list mailing list
> gnome-shell-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list

even though i use core2duo gnome-shell seems not performing well with my
ATI card(at least for the time being). so the best thing for me is to
stay with 2.6 bcz i don't want to go to kde too.