On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Ryan Peters
<sloshy45 sbcglobal net> wrote:
In all honesty, I prefer AWN 0.4 to Docky. Faster, lightweight, doesn't
use Mono (main reason why it's so fast and lightweight ;) ) and it
already has a large community of users/developers.
Check
it out here. I'm using it on Ubuntu 9.10 and even though I'm using
trunk builds it's very stable.
Using 'language' as a reason not to accept something is sort of silly. Consider that gnome-shell is written in _javascript_. :-)
We should only be interested in the engine. What you use for your bottom panel is probably a user choice.
I haven't had a chance to play with Zeitgist. I'd like spend some time looking at it to see how it fits in with everything. I haven't seen a compelling use case yet other than recent documents.
