Re: more thoughts on gconfd situation



On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 16:15, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
> seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu> writes:
> > I bounced the bug to the nfs mailing list. Trond was surprised that it
> > doesn't work. I was curious why nfs-utils wasn't 1.0 in skipjack, even.
> >
> 
> Here's the bug, I see you found it since you're on cc but maybe
> someone else is interested:
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59245
>  
> I don't know why Trond is surprised, he's been on the cc list of that
> bug forever. ;-) Re: version of nfs-utils, I have no idea, would have
> to ask sct.

Trond Mykelbust - nfs client maintainer - not teg redhat com :)

sorry.

-sv

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]