Re: more thoughts on gconfd situation



On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 10:55, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
> seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu> writes: 
> > will gconf-sanity-check-1 fix problems it encounters that are fixable?
> >
> 
> At the moment it just tells you how I think ("run rm whatever") 
>  
> > *nod*
> > 
> > I'll see about testing if the locking is still unhappy over nfs under
> > 2.4.18-somereleasehere. If a crashed out lock can be correctly
> > overridden then a lot of the problem I was having will go away.
> 
> The NFS thing is in bugzilla, and not closed yet, IIRC.
> It's on the nfs-utils component.
> 

I bounced the bug to the nfs mailing list. Trond was surprised that it
doesn't work. I was curious why nfs-utils wasn't 1.0 in skipjack, even.

-sv

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]