Re: more thoughts on gconfd situation

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu> writes: 
> will gconf-sanity-check-1 fix problems it encounters that are fixable?
>

At the moment it just tells you how I think ("run rm whatever") 
 
> *nod*
> 
> I'll see about testing if the locking is still unhappy over nfs under
> 2.4.18-somereleasehere. If a crashed out lock can be correctly
> overridden then a lot of the problem I was having will go away.

The NFS thing is in bugzilla, and not closed yet, IIRC.
It's on the nfs-utils component.

Havoc