Re: gnome-terminal dimensions
- From: "John P. Verel" <jverel home com>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnome-terminal dimensions
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 11:18:50 -0400
On 07/03/01, 09:38:18PM +0800, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
---snip---
> Oops! I forgot to mention the super-secret trick that window managers
> play on you. :-)
Morning. Running sawfish-0.38-ximian.4, gnome-core-1.4.0.4-ximian.3, on
Red Hat 7.1, 2.4.2-2. My sawfish Placement is set to "Automatically
remember window positions, Automatically remember window sizes,
Automatically remember other window attributes, Don't automatically
remember details of transient windows." Gnome-terminal is started
without any geometry settings. On this basis, g-t size and position are
rembered and work flawlessly. Perhaps the only "glitch" I find is that
the size and position of a second instance is remembered separately from
the first instance, i.e. if I exit a maximized second instance but not
the first instance, those settings will be used next time I open two g-t
instances.
John
>
> I'll bet you have the "Method of placing windows" setting under the
> "Placement" menu set to something other than "None". In that case,
> sawfish takes over the window placement and will ignore the geometry
> placement to a certain extent.
>
> Doing something like --geometry=80x25+0-100 will still get a window
> placed half of the screen, though. I think this is because the terminal
> initally asks to be placed in a stupid position and the window manager
> realises there is a lot of space for it there and so it fits easily.
>
> I don't know if this is a bug or a feature of sawfish (I suspect the
> latter, since you said it happens with twm as well), but I find it to be
> a pain. :-)
--
John P. Verel
Norwalk, CT
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]