Re: [OFFTOPIC] StarOffice and Glibc 2.1 (was: Updated gnome-* RPMs)

["Marc G. Glade" <marcg unforgettable com>]

"Peter C. Norton" wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Mar 20, 1999 at 06:24:26AM +0000, Marc G. Glade wrote:
> > Ok, I just did an ldd against StarOffice and it shows that it is not a
> > dynamic executable. When I run the program i get the simple message:
> > Aborted. I may be misunderstanding something, but if StorOffice is not
> > dynamically linked to glibc, how does going from 2.0 to 2.1 break
> > staroffice.
> 
> Is it a shell script or a wrappper that exec()'s a dynamic library?
> 
> -Peter
Okay, I must be getting tired, can't believe I missed that. Correct,
soffice is just a wrapper and soffice.bin is the exec. It is dynamically
linked to glibc among others.
-- 
Marc G. Glade					AIM: MarcGlade
marcg@unforgettable.com				 ICQ: 14831115
http://homepages.together.net/~glade/