Re: gtk+ and gtk-engines slow
- From: Sergio Kessler <ser perio unlp edu ar>
- CC: Gnome-List <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gtk+ and gtk-engines slow
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 03:02:02 -0300
bratsche@dfw.net wrote:
>
> There's no reason why GNOME shouldn't be able to run on the 486 machines
> of which Miguel spoke. I think expecting them to run the pixmap theme may
> be pushing it though. And expecting them to run a beefed up E theme is
> just nuts. But GNOME by itself, without all the chrome, should be able to
> run on a 486 with 16-24 megs I think. I need to get a new power supply for
> my 486, but when I do I'll be glad to test it. (66mhz with 16 megs).
unfair, just a little unfair ...
ok, this thread doesn't need another opinion, but nobody touched
this issue.
Miguel and his crew are /struggling/ their heads to make Gnome
ligthweigth, very ligthweigth, ligthweigth as possible, they
even wrote an entire ORB because of this goal.
And then come up raster (with a good piece of work, nobody
can't deny this) and say: 'hey, all you losers, want to use
Gnome ?, buy a new computer !'
it _seems_ a little unfair ...
but I'm sure that Miguel and raster will find a good solution.
Sergio
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]