Re: Milestones document
- From: D-Man <dman d137-l025 rh rit edu>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Milestones document
- Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 16:06:34 -0500
I am experiencing the same problem right now. I have 64 megs of
physical RAM and about 100 megs of swap. With E and Window Maker it was
quite slow. Do the themes make a significant difference?
I know that my problem is memory because I have a PII 300, and the CPU
usage isn't maxed out in the load applet.
-D
"Poletti, Don" wrote:
>
> Speaking of memory,
>
> I have not used Gnome much many because on my system it seems
> considerablly slower than Windoze. One of main reasons as far as I
> can tell is due to memory. I have 32 megs and while that is not alot
> by todays standards it should be more than sufficient to bring up
> a desktop and an app or three.
>
> Of course Linux sucks up free ram to use as disk buffers, while this
> is a good thing it makes it hard to determine memory usage.
>
> To recapitulate...
> 1) How much Memory does Gnome use?
> 2) How can I minimize memory usage?
> 3) Is there a conscience effort in development to minimize memory?
> 4) Is there some other reason Linux/gnome/E is slower than Windoze?
>
> Ok there were new questions in there so it wasn't recapitulating but my
> kids have made me watch cat-in-the-hat every day for weeks so the word
> has grown on me.
>
> In other forums similar questions have led to "buy more memory" my
> response to that is that windoze runs well in 32 megs why can't
> linux/gnome/E?
>
> --
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]