Re: [Fwd: Could not autogen.sh]





On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, David J. Orme wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > David J. Orme wrote:
> > > Is this bad behavior from aclocal (ie old version) or is it bad
> > > behavior from the glib install script (ie buggy glib install)?
> >
> > Bad behavior from me, aclocal knows its prefix.  :)
> >
> > If you are taking the "anything non-RPM in /usr/local" attitude you
> > are going to have a rough life continuing to mix programs built for
> > /usr and /usr/local.  Maybe consider un-installing autoconf, automake,
> > libtool RPMs, and installing them manually into /usr/local.  Once that
> > is done, and /etc/ld.so.conf knows about /usr/local/lib, then life
> > should be grand.
> 
> Sounds like a good idea.  Does anyone know what RPM to uninstall in
> order to get rid of autoconf/automake?

On my machine, autoconf, automake and libtool are in the RPMs named
"autoconf", "automake" and "libtool", respectively.

In general, you can find out which RPM contains a binary by typing:
	$ rpm -qf `which <binary>`
For example, to find the autoconf RPM, type:
	$ rpm -qf `which autoconf`


Best of luck,
-Gleef





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]