[Fwd: Could not autogen.sh]
- From: "David J. Orme" <david coconut-palm-software com>
- To: Gnome List <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: [Fwd: Could not autogen.sh]
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:26:14 -0500
-- "Trying to get Windows to run on the hardware that
David Orme Linux typically [flys] on is like pushing
david@coconut-palm-software.com an elephant through a keyhole"
http://www.coconut-palm-software.com --Forbes Magazine
- From: "David J. Orme" <david coconut-palm-software com>
- To: jgarzik pobox com
- Subject: Re: Could not autogen.sh
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:25:51 -0500
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> David J. Orme wrote:
> > Is this bad behavior from aclocal (ie old version) or is it bad behavior
> > from the glib install script (ie buggy glib install)?
>
> Bad behavior from me, aclocal knows its prefix. :)
>
> If you are taking the "anything non-RPM in /usr/local" attitude you are
> going to have a rough life continuing to mix programs built for /usr and
> /usr/local. Maybe consider un-installing autoconf, automake, libtool
> RPMs, and installing them manually into /usr/local. Once that is done,
> and /etc/ld.so.conf knows about /usr/local/lib, then life should be
> grand.
Sounds like a good idea. Does anyone know what RPM to uninstall in order to
get rid of autoconf/automake?
Regards,
Dave
-- "Trying to get Windows to run on the hardware that
David Orme Linux typically [flys] on is like pushing
david@coconut-palm-software.com an elephant through a keyhole"
http://www.coconut-palm-software.com --Forbes Magazine
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]