Re: gnome developer docs - not sgml
- From: luther maxime u-strasbg fr
- To: Miguel de Icaza <miguel nuclecu unam mx>, allbery ece cmu edu
- Cc: luther dpt-info u-strasbg fr, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnome developer docs - not sgml
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 15:09:35 +0100
On Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 05:13:17PM -0600, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>
> > +-----
> > | On Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 11:12:18AM -0600, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > | > compiled on lots of platforms). But yes, most non-free systems don't come
> > | > with all the software considered standard on Linux so you have to compile
> > | > it yourself. Too bad for them. ;-)
> > |
> > | ok too bad for me then :(, i suppose this mean it is no more a goal for gnome
> > | to compile on any major UNIX plateform ?)
> > +--->8
> >
> > Apparently the FSF and associated developers have decided (again) that
> > GNU/<insert OS here> is the only platform. :-( For all intents and purposes
> > GNOME is out of the running as a GUI for any platform but Linux.
>
> What is this? I have compiled GNOME in IRIX and Solaris myself. Yes,
> you have to install some extra libraries, but why is that such a
> problem?
>
Which one do you need to install ????
i am trying to compile gnome-libs since version 0.30 was released, without much
luck ...
> I rather depend on extra libraries than not providing the
> functionality.
yes you are right, but it ias not nice to depend on uncompilable libraries and
other such. I think automake/autoconf can check for the existence of a
compatible version of said libraries ...
Friendly,
Sven LUTHER
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]