Re: Bug reports for 0.99 RPMs
- From: Damien Miller <dmiller ilogic com au>
- To: raster redhat com
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Bug reports for 0.99 RPMs
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 08:45:26 +1100 (EST)
On Thu, 17 Dec 1998 raster@redhat.com wrote:
> On 18 Dec, Damien Miller scribbled:
> -> I just installed the 0.99.0-0 RPMs.
> ->
> -> Nice work! I especially like the pager applet.
> ->
> -> Here are the bugs I have found so far:
> ->
> -> General:
> ->
> -> - All apps seem slower to update, the refresh logic seems to be less
> -> efficient (relative to 0.30).
> ->
> -> - The pixmap theme is especially slower at refreshes.
>
> what do you expect :)
I should have said:
The pixmap theme is especially slower at refreshes, I could see
certain parts of windows getting re-displayed several times.
> -> Panel:
> ->
> -> - Sliding the panel is slow (using the RPM version of enlightenment as
> -> my wm)
>
> thats because the panel is a normal WM client - thus when it slides it
> involves not just a trip to the Xserver but a trip to X, then a trip
> for X to the WM then a trip form the WM back to X - then back to the
> client again to get its synthetic configurenotify event. basically the
> problme is: the panle does nto slide at X pixels per second, but at X
> pixels per step - thus a slow machine will slide it slowly, a fast
> machine will do it quickly. The "optimal" solution is for the panel to
> time the time between moves and adjust its distance to "slide" each
> iteration according to how long the last one took.
Again, I should have been a bit more clear:
Sliding the panel is slow compared to GNOME 0.30 on icewm.
Regards,
Damien Miller
--
| "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox
| Damien Miller - http://www.ilogic.com.au/~dmiller
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]